Pre-Trial Rights of Accused: Comparing Pakistani and International Legal Frameworks

Author: Dr Nasir Majeed, Raja Muhammad Usman Rashed, Tabinda Rani 

Abstract

The present study intended to compare five pre-trial accused’s rights including the right to know the
reasons of arrest, the right to be produced before magistrate, right not to be tortured, right of privacy
and dignity in Pakistani and international legal frameworks. After following functional approach in
comparative legal studies, the present study found that the right to know the reasons of arrest is
recognized but its scope in terms of time and language is different in Pakistani and international legal
frameworks except UDHR. The study also found that the right of production of an accused is
recognized in domestic and international instruments except UDHR; however, the nature, time and
scope of the forum differ. Likewise, the prohibition on torture is acknowledged in all national and
international legal instruments with the variation in the scope of this right. The study also noted that
the right of privacy is recognized as a conditional right in national and international legal
instruments. However, the scope of this right is different in these instruments. The analysis also
reveals that the right to dignity is acknowledged as an absolute right in national and internal legal
framework with the only difference that ICCPR specifically gives this right to an accused. It is
expected that the present study will offer assistance to legislature and judiciary to improve the
existing legal framework pertaining to the rights of accused

Keywords

accused rights, international human rights instruments, fundamental rights, accused in criminal administration of justice, accused in police custody

References

Abad, N. D. (2018). The Legal Framework for the Protection of Fundamental Rights of the Suspect
or Accused in Transnational Proceedings Under the EPPO. The European Public Prosecutor’s
Office: The Challenges Ahead, 235-252.
ABDUL QADIR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, 2002 S C M R 1478 (Supreme Court of
Pakistan 2002).
Al-Eshaikh, H. A. (2005). Human rights and the trial of the accused: a legal comparative study
between the judicial system in Saudi Arabia and the standards required by the European
Convention on Human Rights (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).
AMJAD MUSTAFA MALIK Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUREAU and 4 Others, P L D 2021 Islamabad 266 (Islamabad 2019).
Assembly, U. G. (1966). International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations, Treaty
Series, 999, 171.
CAT/C/GC/2 (2008).
Ch. ZAHOOR ILLAHI versus THE STATE AND OTHERS, 1975 P Cr. L J 1413 (Lahore 1975).
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (1973).
https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1973/en/102484
Eberle, E. J. (2011). The methodology of comparative law. Roger Williams UL Rev., 16, 51.
Eberle, E. J. (2011). The methodology of comparative law. Roger Williams UL Rev., 16, 51.
European Convention on Human Rights, as Amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15, ETS No. 005
(1950). https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/coe/1950/en/18688
Fayaz, M. (2018). The Vires of Pre-Charge Terror Detention in Pakistan and the UK: A Liberal
Critique and Comparison. University of Central Lancashire.
George Jr, B. J. (1990). Rights of the Criminally Accused. LAW & CoNTEMP. PROBs., 53, 71.
George Jr, B. J. (1990). Rights of the Criminally Accused. LAW & CoNTEMP. PROBs., 53, 71.
Gomez, J. (2004). Rights of Accused Persons: Are Safeguards being Reduced?.
Hashmi, M. A. I., Ullah, H., Ahmad, I., & Tabassam, M. A. (2021). A Comparative Study of
Fundamental Rights of the Accused in Police Custody: A Study of Pakistan. Harf-oSukhan, 5(4), 149-180.
Human Rights Act 1998, Pub. L. No. 1998 Chapter 42, UK Public General Acts (1998).
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents.
Hussain, A., Khadim, M. N., & Khanam, L. (2021). Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical
Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan. Global Regional Review, VI, 6,
307-313.
Hussain, A., Khadim, M. N., & Khanam, L. (2021). Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical
Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan. Global Regional Review, 6.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 999, p. 171 § Treaty Series (1966).
https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/unga/1966/en/17703
Jørgensen, N. H. (2004). The right of the accused to self-representation before international criminal
tribunals. American Journal of International Law, 98(4), 711-726.
Kamba, W. J. (1974). Comparative law: A theoretical framework. International & Comparative Law
Quarterly, 23(3), 485–519.
Kremens, K. (2011). The protection of the accused in international criminal law according to the
human rights law standard. Wroclaw Review of Law.
Lawson, F. H. (1977). Comparative judicial style. Am. J. Comp. L., 25, 364.
DOI: 10.52279/jlss.06.04.376387 Page | 386
Journal of Law & Social Studies 2024
Le Moli, G. (2019). The principle of human dignity in international law. In General principles and
the coherence of international law (pp. 352–368). Brill Nijhoff.
Legrand, P. (2019). What is that, to read foreign law. J. Comp. L., 14, 290.
Mahmood, M. T. (2021). Rights of Accused Under International Human Rights, Islam and Domestic
Legislation of Pakistan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selinus University.
Majeed, N., & Hilal, A. (2022). Approaches and Methodologies in Comparative Legal Studies: An
Abstract Framework as Methodology. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3),
474–488.
Mohtarma BENAZIR BHUTTO and Another versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and Others, 1998
S C M R 388 (Supreme Court of Pakistan 1997).
MUSALI KHAN Versus THE STATE, 1996 M L D 493 (Peshawar 1995).
Mustafa, A. U. (2017). A critical analysis of Pakistan’s compliance with the United Nations
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment: An Alternative View.
Najman, M. (2021). How the dignity was understood in law in past and how it should be today.
Tribuna Juridică, 11(Special), 316–331.
Pakistan: Code of Criminal Procedure, Act No. V (1898).
https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1898/en/98172
Peters, A., & Schwenke, H. (2000). Comparative law beyond post-modernism. International &
Comparative Law Quarterly, 49(4), 800–834.
Pleić, M. (2020). Procedural Rights of Suspects and Accused Persons During Pre-Trial Detention –
Impact of Detention Conditions on Efficient Exercise of Defence Rights. EU and Comparative
Law Issues and Challenges Series.
Police Order (2002), Chief Executive’s Order No. 22 (2002).
Pushkarev, V. V., Artemova, V. V., Ermakov, S. V., Alimamedov, E. N., & Popenkov, A. V. (2020).
Criminal prosecution of persons, who committed criminal, acts using the сryptocurrency in
the Russian Federation. Revista San Gregorio, (42), 330-335.
Qanun-e-Shahadat Ordinance (1984), President’s Order No. 10 (1984).
Qayum, S., Farid, S., Shehzad, S., & Weidong, Z. (2016). Short comings of criminal justice system
of Pakistan and its effects on the rights of accused prisoner wrongfully convicted or
imprisoned. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(32), 13–27.
RAMZAN, M., SAEED, S., BUKSH, I., HUSSAIN, Z., & OBAID, H. M. (2021). PRESIDENT OF
PAKISTAN: A STUDY ON THE RIGHT OF PARDON. Bulletin of Business and Economics
(BBE), 10(4), 226–231.
Rashid, U. (2019). The Right to Dignity and the Right to Legal Representation: Has Pakistan Failed
Its Most Vulnerable Citizens. PLR, 10, 113.
Reitz, J. C. (1998). How to do comparative law. Am. j. Comp. L., 46, 617.
Rheinstein, M. (1937). Teaching comparative law. U. Chi. L. Rev., 5, 615.
Rogers, R., Sharf, A. J., Clark III, J. W., Drogin, E. Y., Winningham, D. B., & Williams, M. M.
(2016). One American perspective on the rights of accused: An initial survey of Miranda
rights in a broader context. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(4), 477-494.
Roy, S. (1997). Violations of the Rights of the Accused and the Convicted in India. Kriminologija i
Socijalna Integracija, 5, 83.
Sabu, A. (2022). Critical Analysis of the Rights of the Accused in India. Issue 1 Indian JL & Legal
Rsch., 4, 1.
Saleem, S., Ashfaq, M., & Ashraf, S. S. (2023). Rights of Accused in Criminal Investigation in
Pakistan. Journal of Policy Research, 9(1), 252–256.
Samuel, G. (2014). An introduction to comparative law theory and method (Vol. 11). Bloomsbury
Publishing.
Schaefer, D. D. (2009). The Future of the Korean and European Union Constitutions: A Comparative
Analysis of Rights of the Accused. Gonz. J. Int’l L., 13, 93.
DOI: 10.52279/jlss.06.04.376387 Page | 387
Journal of Law & Social Studies 2024
Shaikh, K. (2022). The Right to Fair Trial in Pakistan: An Analysis of its Implementation and
International Recognition. Available at SSRN 4526164.
Shea, T. M. (2011). The Sixth Amendment: The Rights of the Accused in Criminal Cases. The Rosen
Publishing Group, Inc.
Sherwani, M. (2019). Rights of the accused in the legal system of Pakistan: a legal
analysis. Islamabad Law Review, 3(3&4), 100-111.
Sherwani, M. (2019). Rights of the accused in the legal system of Pakistan: A legal analysis.
Islamabad Law Review, 3(3 & 4), 100–111.
Silva, A. (2000). The right to be informed of the grounds of arrest in criminal proceedings as
guaranteed by the constitutions of the South‐Asian states and the European convention on
human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 4(2), 44–66.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980008406875
TAHIR NAQASH and Others Versus The STATE and Others, P L D 2022 Supreme Court 385
(Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022).
Tarase, G. M., & Talawar, S. P. (2013). A study of rights and safeguards of accused in
India. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 3(8), 66-81.
Taylor, P. M. (2020). A Commentary on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
The UN Human Rights Committee’s Monitoring of ICCPR Rights. Cambridge University
Press.
THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN Versus MRS. ROWSHAN BIJAYA SHAUKAT ALI
KHAN, P L D 1966 Supreme Court 286 (Supreme Court of Pakistan 1965).
THE STATE Versus Mst. ZUHRA BIBI and Another, 1996 P Cr. L J 546 (Peshawar 1994).
Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention and Punishment) Act, 2022 (2022).
Troper, M. (2003). The logic of justification of judicial review. International Journal of Constitutional
Law, 1(1), 99–121.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 217 A (III) (1948).
https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/1948/en/11563
UZMA NAVEED CHAUDHARY and Others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and Others,
P L D 2022 Supreme Court 783 (Supreme Court of Pakistan 2022).
Weissbrodt, D., & Zinsmaster, K. K. (2011). Protecting the fair trial rights of the accused in
international criminal law. In Research Handbook on International Criminal Law. Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Whytock, C. A. (2009). Legal origins, functionalism, and the future of comparative law. BYU L.
Rev., 1879.
Yong-Joo Kang v. Republic of Korea, CCPR/C/78/D/878/1999 (UN Human Rights Committee July
16, 2003). https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,404887efa.html
Zahoor, R., Arif, S. M. W. K., & Bannian, B. (2022). The Concept of Bail in Pakistani Legal System
A Legal Analysis. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3), 413–424.
Zappalà, S. (2010). The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused. Journal of International
Criminal Justice, 8(1), 137-164.
Zweigert, K. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law. Clarendon Pre-Ss.

DOI: 10.52279/jlss.06.04.376387  | 376-387  |  PDF